Shame, you must be bannishéd from this forum. (I’m kidding of course, it’s fine. I barely know anything outside of MCU movies and those are just 'cause action movies -especially superhero movies- are extremely fun.)
I mean knowing Dragon Age Inquisition it looks like Bioware has a thing for arm-losing protagonists so that’s a highly plausible outcome. (Or denial… but I’m with you in that Shepard shouldn’t die after all that.)
Ahaha, sadly not. It was a project I did during a writing exercise in which we had to write a character that was, in some ways, outside of the niche. It occurred to me that there’s a severe lack of protagonists that have physical disabilities from the get-go (and not losing a limb at the end of an epic adventure) who are still pretty darn amazing at what they do despite their physical limitations.
Since it was just a writing exercise it never really… got past the first chapter. Most of my time was spent researching how to work a prosthetic.
I haven’t said already, don’t worry!
Mmm… the original version of this story took place in a kind of parallel 1920s-America universe (although the original idea was essentially scrapped save for few key points regarding the book-MC, and didn’t even include The City.)
So medically I’d say late 1910s? Right around when vaccines, anti-bacterial drugs, vitamins, etc. are starting to come into play and such, but there’s still a lot of illness that can’t be cured (a la Influenza Pandemic of 1918), which would also make a lot of sense for the prosthetics, which while slightly more advanced than common medicine (as evident by the existence of the torso, faulty as that existence is) but they’d probably look and act similarly to ye ole prosthetics, albeit made of metal instead of wood and leather because wood and leather don’t exactly exist in abundance.
Pretty slow, to be honest. Most people, including kids, won’t see a major medical breakthrough in their lifetime. They might see a technological breakthrough, and some minor improvements in prosthetics, but most of The City’s resources go towards… well, The City. Repairs and such rather than medicine. Not to mention the lack of resources makes it even harder. It’s not like an herbologist can just up and grow a control group of one drug compared to this other drug, where would it grow? The Farm? The City wouldn’t allow that.
Most likely? No. The City doesn’t like taking in those who have already developed their own… ideas… about the way of life under its wings. Besides, they haven’t had training or mentorship or any of that. Is it impossible? …Eh, no? I mean it’s unlikely, highly unlikely, but if you’re in The City’s good graces it might make an exception.
Those would go to orphanages. Probably never adopted, but unless they get life-threateningly sick and/or end up half-crushed under a collapsed building The City won’t take in healthy children.
Well, why do you think it’s hard to get on The City’s bad side? What could you do that could possibly make you some kind of rabbel rouser that wouldn’t essentially kill you and the people in The City as well? Then again you could also say that The City is the only reason you’re able to live, that without The City you’d all be dead in The Underground and wouldn’t be able to live. The City could have saved you… but it also could be trapping you. You never know, do you?
You’re all good, I don’t think it’s been asked before? Not sure.
In an effort to be enigmatic, vague, and spoiler-free I’m going to have to reply with the usual parenthetical that I add to any prior statement:
So far as anyone knows.
There’s less Children than normal citizens, since most kids don’t make it through the procedure, die before The City can save them, or are just healthy enough to grow up with a normal human family.
So… maybe 3:10? Not exactly rare but still pretty uncommon.