The Wayhaven Chronicles: Book Three (WIP -FINAL DEMO)

Hi all, just want to remind you all that we have a Wayhaven Chronicles General Discussion thread for topics other Book 3 feedback. This helps to separate the feedback for Book 3 with other discussions.

Thank you for your understanding!


That moment in the LT route when you choose A instead of N to go with you to the station and N doesn’t say goodbye to you (think your relationship with N should be higher than your relationship with A to trigger, idk). I freakened out when I read it yesterday :joy:


One of the many reasons why I am not going to do the LT route. Too much ankst for me. I also find it morally cruel to one or both of the RO’s, but that’s just my personal opinion.


Just a small critique, it seems a little jarring when Rebecca pulls MC aside, at this part:

“Are you still willing to be a part of this team now? This world?” she asks suddenly. “Murphy was one thing, but now every supernatural and Trapper will know you. What you can do.” Her eyes find mine and don’t shift from them, apparently trying to read my reaction."

If you have a very sarcastic MC with a poor relationship and respond with “What strange mother and daughter conversations we have.” It doesn’t come off very sarcastic or biting like I expected, but rather genuine and lighthearted. It feels like Rebecca is crossing a boundary with this conversation, so it would make sense for a poor relationship sarcastic mc to be a little more snide.


Okay I know its late, but I try to do the Verda know about the supernatural path and what a plot TWIST. I don’t know whats real or whats not anymore…


For any fellow code-divers (or I guess people willing to read about potential spoilers):

Speculation about code in the second demo

Does anyone have any thoughts about what “sin +1” could mean? Every route you take in the second demo when investigating the crime scene has an option that gives you one (checking the backpack, asking why the parents were unconscious, etc.). Do we think we’re gonna see an angel and Sera’s take on their mythology in this book?


I thought the kidnapper or whatever was an angel because of the mentioning of a feather and a super old, powerful creature. Idk what the coding means for MC though :flushed:


Could you imagine if MC had to be judged by a council of angels because of their investigating or something? Like because MC is “meddling”, or at least involved, they’d be like “bro, I think they’re in on this”…??? …now that I’ve typed it out, it sounds stupid but Imma hit that reply button either way.


(Code discussion below)

I definitely think angels will be featured in this book. Sera has hinted at them showing up for awhile now, but specified that her version of it doesn’t have religious associations involved. The sin aspect is interesting though. The word has some sort of moral judgement association which makes me think MC is being judged on something, but that might be too close to the maa-alused thing from book 2. Or it could be a “wrong choice” kind of deal that leads you further away from a successful rescue mission, but I’m not sure why the word sin would be used in that context.


I don’t think this variable is for MC. More like it is for the kidnapped girl. If the relatively harmless evidence is found (for example, site for supernatural teens), the code gives +1 to “rescue” variable. But for more serious evidence (the stimulant) it gives +1 to “sin”. Maybe there will be something similar to the treaty from book 2 - various outcomes depending on your score through the book.


That’s a good point! I’m on board with that idea.

1 Like

Just wanted to pop in and say I’m really enjoying Book Three. I love how consistent the feel and tone of the books are. Another great read!


Oooh. That’s definitely interesting. I, myself, have no idea how to even look at or read the code, so I’m just figuring it out based on what’s shared by others, but given the fact that I think an angel took the kid, it would definitely make sense that the kid is being judged for some kind of behavior that led to the angel taking them to begin with

1 Like

How do you even find/read it? (I know this isn’t the right place to ask, but it rubs me the wrong way when others post/discuss codes and I don’t even know what it is :expressionless:)

1 Like

You put ”scenes” at the end of the url.


Good theory, but then how did the trappers fall into all of it? The angels seem to be chained somehow.

Seems to be that the kid, or the supernatural who took her, is a sinner since the first time they appear on chap one is in a label called “sinpov1”
Maybe she’s doing things that can make people in town suspect that the supernatural exist and this leash-holder think their duty is to not let the common folk discover the supernatural so they need to stop these supernatural sinners? (maybe the angel is a sinner too) But I don’t see how this relates to Trappers/Rogues so…

I’m going pretty far heh

1 Like

Hm, that I’m not sure about. I feel like we don’t really know a lot about the trappers either. Like who they are, where they come from, how much power they’ve accumulated.

That’s fair. I mean, last time we had any contact with them, they were essentially attacking us with jacked up cattle prod’s. Granted, there were a lot of jacked up cattle prod’s.

It would kind of makes sense, if they were different factions. Like, the cattle prod bunch was one, this bunch is possibly another, etc.
also. Sinprov1? That’s a legit cool name.

I played that path a while ago but couldn’t find the nerve to continue bc the thought of damaging my friendship with Verda was… unbearable. but your comment definitely intrigue my curiosity and well I am a sucker for plot twists

and boiiiiiiiiii I definitely didn’t see that coming! and a possible double date with my RO? like sign me right up!!! so curious to see how this branch of choices going to affect the main story. Sera, I’d give you my kidney if its possible but for now please settle with my humogous love for your works :heart: :heart: :heart: