So for those who thought M isn’t able to love the MC until they get their memories back (or that they lost the ability for romantic love along with all their memories when Chana wiped them), Sera posted this today on her tumblr:
So yeah, M is just stupid. Though, apparently, M may show a few signs of starting to fall for the MC in b3. Just a couple more books to go before M pulls their head out of their ass, I guess!
My M-mancer may keel over from shock. 
Has anyone asked Sera how the soulmate thing is compatible with the triangle route? Maybe there’s a different definition of “soulmate” at play here than the one I think of?
May I ask why you feel “soulmate” is incompatible with the love triangle?
Wait, did I miss some kinda discussion about soulmates?
The definition of “soulmate” I’m working from is one-on-one - you’re someone else’s soulmate, they’re your soulmate, you are meant/destined/etc. for each other, true love, yadda yadda. Two people having the same soulmate, or one person with two soulmates, doesn’t work under that definition. But Sera apparently has said these romances are soulmate situations.
Ok, but that doesn’t clash with the Love Triangle: it is specifically a love triangle, not a poly relationship. The MC doesn’t end up with N and A, it’s either/or.
Sera has said the Wayhaven romances are a soulmate situation.
actually they do. It is said that peoples do have more than 1 soulmates. Dunno where I read it, some say 3 some say up to 5.
And they are the same soulmates as 1x1.
But it is puzzling she is using the definition for the Love-Triangle. If all 3 are soulmates, that’s akin to murder of a Soul.
That would make sense. I was just wondering if Sera had actually stated that’s how the soulmate thing works in the Wayhaven 'verse.
The LT isn’t multiple soulmates, it’s just the Detective figuring out which of the two is their soulmate.
Try this, where someone asks about how soulmates work in Wayhaven:
There are other asks about soulmates I may dig up later if I have a chance.
That would be one way to do it. Either that, or someone die 
So then it’s not a soulmate situation in the love triangle case, despite Sera saying these are soulmate romances. It’s one pair of soulmates and a pseudo-soulmate spare tire.
I mean, no, it’s still a soulmate situation, between the Detective and whomever they end up staying with at the end. Unless you’re counting every relationship that has ever not panned out a pseudo-soulmate situation.
I think I remember an ask from way back specifically about the LT where she said they are both the MC’s soulmate, but I can’t remember for certain and I only have things catalogued that pertain to M or the group as a whole, lol. I may search later!
Exactly! 
Nobody else matters anyway, so you got all the important info.
No, of course not. Sera is the one who said these were all soulmate relationships. I’m just trying to figure out what that means in the LT case.
confusion intensifies
Possibly one is the romantic soulmate and the other is a platonic or familial soulmate?
(I object to the concept of soulmates on principle, so my take on this whole theme is ‘meh’)
@JBento and @EvilChani you two are just terrible, just terrible
Shame, shame. 
I love the concept of Soulmates and Love at 1st sight. That’s what I write about most days 
Although I wasn’t always, then I got to play some good ones that converted me.
Please, we’re M-mancers, what makes you think either of us has any shame? And if we did, why would it be related to actually picking the best partner?
“Oops! I actually think of you as a sibling. My bad. It’s so easy to get those feelings confused.” 