Yeah, but before it said she was close to the soldiers and even gave them massages, but hadn’t cheated unless you fucked up when talking to her about it. I’m just saying it’s possible she hadn’t. But also people who decide to marry her should understand what they’re getting into at this point.
Yeah but Brendell has clearly taken a liking to her, and if she’s taken captive and the MC made peace with Sielccia(Noyedas dead), then she will likely fall in love with him as the MC had technically abandoned her because he wasn’t willing to fight(this earns the Peacemaker achievement btw).
I don’t think she’ll fall in love with him so quickly. If she does then honestly this is just another reason to not marry Hereya though.
Maybe @MahatmaDagon will tell us if she did or not.
Well maybe you’re right, but I still think Hereya can be a decent wife, but certainly not the best. But the path in which she forms a mercenary company and comes with a “heir pretender” when things become uncertain in the MC’s province should be an interesting branch to play around with as the MC’s heir.
@MahatmaDagon is Jenneth Barren? Or in order to become spymaster she has to become like sister Myra? I don’t see any mention of her conceiving even if the MC commits adultery with her.
I think that was supposed to be a one off interaction. Not the start of of an affair IIRC.
Which didn’t result in conception.
Further she could always use Silphium to abort the foetus even if that happened.
Also She is MCs half sister
You can choose to have an affair with her in the epilogue
Not to mention she is aware of her origins and had sex with her half sibling regardless.
@MahatmaDagon I am not convinced that archers in the game are overpowered. It is certainly historically accurate to have armies composed primarily of archers such as the English army at the Battle of Agincourt during the Hundred Years’ War where out of approximately 6000 English soldiers, 5000 were longbowmen and the English cavalry was ordered to dismount and focus on protecting the archers. The French army at Agincourt was 4 to 6 times larger than the English force but because the English were able to drive in stakes to keep French cavalry away, the French army was slaughtered.
So really it comes down to whether the archers have defenses set up in time to protect them from cavalry as without such defenses in place in time, the cavalry will win such as at the Battle of Patay where a small French cavalry force defeated a much larger force of English archers.
I would also say that 500 archers in this game is nothing. The MC can start with 300 and so one month of training will add another 200. So we could easily have 500 within one month of starting the game. On the subject of training troops, in my opinion there is no reason wealth permitting to train less than the maximum number per training cycle. It takes the same amount of time to train the smallest number of soldiers of a given type as it does to train the largest number of soldiers of a given type so wealth permitting the MC is always better off training the largest number of a given type possible. Wealth permitting, the MC should always be recruiting and always training new troops. In my playthroughs, I typically end up with somewhere between 700-1100 archers having spent one training cycle on knights for catching Noyedas later. I could add on another 200 archers if my MC completely skipped knights which would probably increase the odds of winning the battle anyway.
Here is a list of some typos in the latest version of the game.
*label arenaWork
*set workingOnArena 1
*set workArenaDate totalDays + 25
*if father = 1
"There used to be a place that served in arenas back then, but Lord ${fatherName} had it dismantled. People said he did it because he saw a way to make more aurens by turning the place into something else, but I don't know if there's truth to that. I'm just glad I can make a new one."
*if father = 2
"The old arena is abandoned. People say $!{title} ${fathername} preferred real battles, and he often sought them outside of his walls. I believe we can renovate it and make it usable again, though, given time. Nothing wrong with some fighting that doesn't necessarily has to end with someone's death."
*if father = 3
"There used to be an arena, but Lord ${fatherName} declared it illegal to have any fighting that was not authorized by him first. And indeed this was good to avoid necessary bloodshed, but people became less and less prone to dueling legally because of the time it took for the petitions to be accepted... well, to cut a long story short, the arena was abandoned and people started hiring more and more assassins. Still, we can use the place again, after a deep renovation."
*if father = 4
"There is an abandoned old arena. People say ${title} ${name} believed that jousts and tourneys of the sorts were the source of unnecessary violence, but I have to tell you, that was not one of his most popular decisions. Still, it will be good to renovate it and put it to good use again."
The text for type 2 and type 4 fathers should say Lord instead of ${title} which is problematic if the MC is female. Also for type 2 fathers, I think it should be:
Nothing wrong with some fighting that doesn’t necessarily have to end with someone’s death.
*if summitClothes = 6
*if (combat < 30)
The heavy armor you were wearing made it an incredibly tiresome journey, perhaps because you were not well accustomed to its weight.
*if ((combat < 50) and (combat >= 30))
Although you were not a stranger to physical activities, the heavy armor made the ascend a very tiresome journey.
*if (combat >= 60)
The heavy armor you were wearing could make it a tiresome incline, were not for the your own personal strength and stamina.
There is a gap in the if statements when 60 > combat >= 50. Also it should be:
Although you were not a stranger to physical activities, the heavy armor made the ascent a very tiresome journey.
Lend more 300 to the Alchemist’s Guild.
It should probably be 300 more.
“So you finally admit you been with my wife?” the merchant snaps, a mixture of anger and satisfaction in his voice.
It should be either you have been or you were.
The people present are surprised with the turn of the events. While they are certainly not daring of contradicting their lady, they certainly would value some explanation for the accusation.
This might be grammatically correct but the phrasing feels awkward to me and to me it feels more natural to phrase that as to contradict.
“Most of the records about her life were burned when the Meinstrel took over. The little there is to know about her is that people really believed she had the Sight. No one knows what happened to her after the battle at King’s End. Some say she was slain along her king, other say she fled to the Thornwood with one of the knights from Vytheo’s court.”
I think it should be either along with her or alongside her.
You do not let this takes your concentration from the battle, and you evade his next blow immediately. Then comes the opportunity, as he was not expecting you to be so quick, and you hit him hard in the head with your wooden sword.
It should be take.
“I never lied to you, !{title} ${name}. And I thought those people how to fight, not how to betray. But I suppose it comes with the job, when your life’s on the line for aurens, to think that they are worth more than anything else. Lord Noyedas must’ve offered them plenty, and they disregarded my orders.”
It should be taught.
Nada had once mentioned being the nephew of an old woman called Tina, who served at your castle for most of her life. Yet, when the supposed aunt was questioned, you soon learned that the relation between the two was fabricated: Tina knew little about Nada other than the fact that the girl had not been around for long and had somehow quickly raised inside the servant’s hierarchy.
It should be niece and risen.
Ullus still acts as though his troops remained loyal after they betray the MC when the MC meets Sielcner in the field and the MC gets wounded. Having looked at 3 separate source code files, my current best guess is that the issue is the mercenaries can switch sides in *label chaos
in battleBegins.txt but so far as I can tell the variable mercsChangedSides
is never set in that text file. Then the conversation with Ullus after the battle takes place in *label afterTalk
in afterBattle.txt and that checks the variable mercsChangedSides
.
I had been assuming that we would play as the heir in the sequel if the MC dies in the first game. Is it even going to be an option to play as the same MC in both the first game and the second game?
Is Jenneth being the MC’s half sister revealed in game or has it only been stated on the forums?
It is said in the game, but I never was able to get that scene.
In my opinion Hereya is untrustworthy would be to paranoid if i married her Danna and Wyneva they are the God tier waifus.
When the MC sleeps with her for the first time, and if he has high social and lore, he will see a tattoo of half a heraldry(for example if your heraldry is an eagle, your MC will see half a eagle tattoo), then in the event where the MC deals with his bastard brother, and if he has a kind father, Jenneth will almost tear up talking of him(MC father), if the MC has high social.
Who are you talking about here.
How do you sleep with her
Jenneth(twenty characters).
I did a bad ending, where the MC went bankrupt, and a servant killed me, after that I came to the conclusion that we urgently need a personal guard (like the Roman Praetorians or the Swiss Guard).
Tbh, the Praetorians would probably murder you themselves if your province went bankrupt
Join Lord Noyedas either by joining him when he first asks you or by surrendering to him. Once you march to Dullis and go to your tent,she’ll sneak in. You can sleep with her there by picking “I want you”. If she survives,you’ll be able to have an affair with her in the epilogue
Hereya is awesome because you get to be a cuckold haha, that stuff is interesting and refreshing because it’s almost always the same type of romances in games, everything is so vanilla and appropriate. No huge age differences, no sub/dom relationships, no fetishes. Well okay there are some of course, but it’s nice to see more.
Well not really the praetorians in the days of Cesur where amazing troops loyal to the end