I think so, yes – though it’ll be hard to make many plans while anarchy escalates over the next couple games. As the shape of the post-Hegemonic world starts to become clearer, there’ll be more space for you to make plans for your personal place in it.
The real theme of XoR.
Sure!
Absolutely. Though the more you managed to make it an organized distribution rather than a mass violent appropriation, the less anarchy you’d accrue.
@Azthyme can. As can @Roodcross.
This is an area where we need to be very careful not to lend support to the noxious idea that people are only “really” transgender if they’ve made some degree of biological transition. A trans man is a man. In real life, there are a lot of different ways people respond when an RO comes out as transgender, and I’ll be trying to write true-to-life options that don’t send a toxic message.
Yes, that’s pretty common in real-world universalistic religions. (None of which have ended up associated with assassin cults, and in the interests of keeping some daylight between Martin’s tropes and my own, there won’t be Faceless Men in the gameworld.)
As you’ll see next chapter, Irduin’s model is collapsing under the pressure of your rebellion and the resentments and expectations it’s brought to the surface. It can inspire your MC to want to build a paternalistic aristocratic future, but the fact that other rebellions will be advocating for more radical options will be one of the toughest hurdles to overcome. Aristocracies work best under an undisturbed fogbank of tradition; once that starts to break up and the arbitrariness of its power divisions is widely recognized, it takes pretty strong charisma to get people looking away from it again.
None of them had a particularly strong nation-like identity; Shayard was the only real proto-nation on the continent. But to the extent that the experience of being an imperial province with an increasingly standardized vernacular language has brought the rest to the point of proto-nationhood, they’d definitely be traditional ancestry-based nations. I don’t think you can have values-based nations without something resembling an Enlightenment, a shift where people gain radical confidence in the ability of humans to create institutions out of rational reflection alone…and while something like that might be an outcome of your rebellion, it would need to percolate for a few more generations before you could have a USA-type republic that manages to have a strongly binding national identity based around something other than a shared language, culture, and religion. Classical cosmopolitanism is the closest you can come, and it’s generally threatened by nationalism rather than compatible with it.
If you’ve spread your skepticism widely enough by then, maybe? Otherwise, people are still going to use the common idiom for an extraordinarily good speaker, even if your specific message is anything but Angelic.
Exactly the intended effect.