I declare myself guilty.
Did a full playthrough during my vacation as a female marshal. Pretty happy how this run turned out, my first one pre-patch was rooough. Iâm not sure if I made the right choices or you renovated the last battle with Rade entirely, was rather surprised how successful I was first try. The best I could do my first run was a stalemate (but I was also unused to army management I suppose).
Canât bring myself to betray Elya, loved helping her grow. The scene made me proud lol.
Looking forward for the sequel!!
I mean put yourself in Milon/Ladaâs shoes. Here is this war veteran you are infatuated with, who then reveals themselves not to be stoic and deep, but rather deeply damaged. Said war veteran proceeds to then launch a coup for the throne against someone who trusted them. Said war veteran may then proceed to be many ruthless actions to keep the throne.
Infatuation fades. It always does. At what point does sense overwhelm feelings of attraction?
Itâs ballsy, thatâs for sure. But is it smart? EhhhâŚ
Nope. Theyâre the âForgotten Oneâ for a reason.
I increased casualties for the loyalist side.
Itâs not that the Bastard King/Queen path is badâI think itâs really, really interestingâitâs just, from a purely objective strategic standpoint, a really, really bad idea. I definitely have no intention of pigeon-holing you into a bad ending, but itâs going to be difficult.
I sincerely hope the question asked during that route is a âis it worth it?â At what point is âgetting my duesâ no longer worth the bloodshed required.
The archbishop of Wrido says the MC is the king.
I added as many death flags as possible and then subverted it. The artistic reasoning was to juxtapose the scenes of Darinâs kindness and gentleness toward the MC with the utter ruthlessness in how he dispatches the assassin. He opens up to the MC in one scene and stomps a dagger into a young manâs throat in the next.
The less artistic reason is that I really wanted to fuck with the readers.
Miljenkoâs final advice at the end of chapter 10 echoes this.
Iâve tried to portray religion in a very nuanced light. Thereâs the scummy archbishop, sure, but thereâs also Father Miljenko. The Catholic Church had some serious corruption problems (just look at the Avignon Papacy), but that doesnât mean every Pope was evil or even unreasonable.
Itâs an interesting thought experiment to consider who is the best to support from a broad, human cost perspective. What would cost more livesâRadeâs subjugation of Kanton, the MCâs, or Elyaâs? Lying down and letting Rade take the throne might spare the people of Wrido, but what about the six years of war after?
The Bastard King/Queen ending isnât doomed to a bad ending, but itâs just as you said: thereâs a hell of a lot of IFs. Thereâs a few more, too, and it depends on the MCâs successors. If the only thing keeping the country together and under this centralized structure is the MCâs sheer force of will, then upon their death, the vultures may begin to circle.
They might not even wait that long. What happens once the MC becomes too old to ride their horse? What happens if the man placed in charge of the army decides he would make a better ruler instead?
So is it worth the cost, then?
A favorite tactic of mine in Crusader Kings. Wait until the vassals revolt (or even provoke an uprising), then imprison them, strip them of their titles, and replace them with loyalists.
Which might make her the best option if your only goal is to prevent the loss of life.
I wasnât trying to imply anything sexual at all. It was much more of a âwe canât keep pining foreverâ moment. I just find it a little unrealistic that two people would dance around the question endlessly.
Emphasis on fleeting. If something happens to the army or the marshalâs ability to lead it, then another war is inevitable.
I donât even think it got that far. Iâll have to reread, but I think thereâs only hugging. Vertical cuddling, if you will.
The issue arises if Lada or Milonâs fear and mistrust for the MC overrules their love.
Oh absolutely. Nobles will be scrambling over themselves to fill that role. Hell, maybe if the MC loses their dishonored status and does a good of enough job, they might be allowed the keep the throne.
Good point. I fix
And fast horses that donât have to lug around riders.
Yes, but you keep the rest of your army intact. If you shoot for the less aggressive options, you can keep most of your army completely untouched.
Iâm weirdly a sucker for Lord Moren for reasons I cannot explain
Velinor? I guess that depends entirely on your definition of Mary Sue, but Iâd disagree with it.
Exactly. Itâs not that sheâs trying to avoid marriage, itâs that she wants a good husband. Preferably a hot and interesting one, too.
^^^ Milon is the adopted one.
And now I have, too, lol
Milon
I swear to god, itâs Milonâs leg and these damn zombie cavalrymen that have given me the most grief in terms of coding.
I⌠wasnât setting out to trick people.
And I understand that, but the story behind the romance in ITFO is a little convoluted. In my very, very early drafts, there was no romance. Then I figured adding the ability to reciprocate Milonâs and Ladaâs advances was a good idea. I was very uncomfortable with writing romance, so I wanted the fewest number of ROs as possible.
I ended up adding Obren as an RO option retrospectively about halfway through the writing process and was simply too far in to go adding extra female characters just so they can be romanced.
His lack of legitimacy means that, even if the crown doesnât oppose him, others will. I think Darin touches on this. If might is the only thing supporting someoneâs claim, then a bunch of others are going to shoot their own shot. Even if they lose in the end, thatâs still a long, brutal civil war. Elyaâs legitimacy makes her a beacon to rally around and put a decisive end to the conflict.
I donât judge. Red flags are just interesting to write.
And a stalemateâs not bad at all, considering youâre likely outnumbered two-to-one. Youâll still do a sizable amount of damage to Radeâs army, too, but you just donât get the glory of a full victory.
Oh dear⌠Here we go again. After feeling that I was slowly getting over my power-hungry ways, you throw me straight into the fire, Bacon.
Milon has a necromantic magical armor from Old Ravaria that allows for the healing and resurrection of the wearer (it worked to heal his leg), and full sets of this is what many cavalrymen wear into battle so that they will be resurrected if they die.
Vassal revolts are scary only at first and if you donât have competent commanders. In reality they are a golden oportunity to re-organize the house and perhaps remind those pesky counts about the divine right of kings.
Honestly, there are times when just surviving is a victory. I think âmanaged to retreat without routingâ would be a perfectly fine victory condition, even if you lost the battle itself by author fiat. IMO, Rade really needs to win some battles to feel like a legitimate threat. In this game, his losses are fine. A lot of them arenât even his losses, theyâre just incompetent underlings getting stomped. The siege is him, but itâs sort of a case of âput up or shut upâ where he doesnât have that many options available and doesnât even know if the Marshal is in charge of the opposition. The one battle he really does lose is the last battle, and thatâs fine.
I think part of this might be that sheâs the only woman in the demo thatâs up who really shows an interest that way. Castle sort of feels like an âRO in name onlyâ where Iâve never really felt like she was that interested in Whiskey.
I think it could work if there was a trial or something like that. Thereâs a substantial difference between âshot in the street by the sheriffâ and âsentenced to hang by the judgeâ.
In Ending 2, Elya could accuse him of high treason and dooming the Queen to a fate worse than death and the Magister Militum to death (if they are both women, then sheâd say they both faced a fate worse than death) at the hands of Rade and his army. Basically saying that Vedran shot first in the kinslaying/kin-dooming. But no matter how neatly itâs done, Vedranâs execution instead of his death in the Marshalâs self-defense (or âself-defenseâ but no one can prove otherwise) is almost certainly going to follow the Marshal and Elya around even if they avoid the worst PR penalty.
@filebkeg He can become enough of a not-dipshit that he can leave the cell? I will play that route a lot in Book 2.
@Bacondoneright Does Vedran, if he survives, have an epilogue? I could have sworn he had one pre-patch.
While I killed him in my âcanonâ playthrought (the one to be carried to book 2), it would be rather neat to see Vedran getting dishonored and having to work his way up to redemption. Maybe the Marshal can even become his mentor in this process.
As I said, I understand why it wasnât included. I just hope in ITUO there will be that representation. That being said, I loved ITFO and will be reading ITUO either way.
But Whiskey himself might be quite a bit into red flag territory for us ordinary humans as wellâŚit takes two to tango and Whiskey is himself just as capable of having a romantic moment amidst the carnage as Uly is. Shonin too would be a bit of a red flag for normal, well-adjusted people.
In a similar vein V from Cyberpunk is probably also a walking red flag, no matter how cute they may look on the outside and that was even before adding the Silverhand personality construct into the mix.
Then if he helps Elya he is dragging out the civil war and adding one more succession crisis into the mix.
And what is âstop being a dumbassâ then a way to say âdo what I think is betterâ?
And âOne succession crisis at a timeâ is just a way to sabotage the MC. If the MC doesnât negotiate the possibility of getting the crown while he has some power, how is he going to negotiate after the war when he has nothing to offer? Just trust that Elya will be good and handle it to him?
And what about it the MC want to be the King of Kanton? That was the point chance the MC would ever have to actually get that, waiting after the war is over, wouldnât be smart.
And if we want to prevent more death, the easiest way would be to side with Rade and force Elya to marry him. Still, I donât think anyone would say that is a good option, even if it was the one that would prevent the most deaths.
Not really, thatâs the only succession crisis thatâs happening that he can influence. I wouldnât really describe it as a succession crisis either, Elyaâs legitimacy isnât in any question, itâs more of a civil war triggered by opportunistic nobles.
Assuming you are talking about the crown of Krorid, there isnât really a point in Elya refusing? It puts someone with legitimacy on the throne of a nation that is probably going to try and take their independence anyways, and if you are not a dick to her, she can rely on your personal loyalty to her as her half-sibling. You are beloved enough that thereâs unlikely to be a revolt against you, so everybody kinda wins?
If he helps Elya to escape prison, he is putting more fire into the woods. The MC had already dealt with Elya, without help she wouldnât be a problem. Now there is only one way to solve the dispute between the siblings, with the death of the other. If what Derin wanted was to prevent more deaths, he failed.
There is one, she can be the ruler. That is why she deflects your questions when you asks her about it.
And who said she will give it to you because she loves you instead of keeping it for herself?
I think the story already showed that family ties arenât that strong when power is involved.
Whatâs that quote that goes something like, âThat couple has huge red flags, I hope they never break up so they donât involve anyone else with itâ?
âŚWould it happen to be this one? Iâve only got it saved because I totally donât love red flags, no way. /s But yeah, itâs really perfect for Whiskey and Uly.
Yes thatâs it!! Thank you for forwarding it, Iâll save it and keep it on hand too <3
She deflects your question because itâs a bit of a pointless one at the current moment. You are embroiled in a civil war, you literally donât have the time to decide upon the next ruler of a region that already has one. Even if she promises you Krorid then, circumstances can change super easily during the civil war; they might revolt, meaning itâs no longer herâs to give; there might be another family that claims the title. Itâs a lot of unknowns to deal with and think through when you already have a life-threatening situation at hand that you need to deal with first, before that matter is discussed.
Why would she? Itâs a region that doesnât want to be ruled by her, and after a fractuous civil war she will likely have bigger things to worry about than both spurning her top military commander who commands the loyalty of the army, and trying to keep Krorid from revolting, or trying to crush it if it does.
If anything it shows Elya being the exception to that rule? She defends you against the baron, she supports you throughout the story pretty much unconditionally when politically itâs poor to centralize so much under their leading general(you can literally coup her because of this). She thanks you repeatedly for your help and promises to show more appreciation later. I really donât know where you are getting the reading that Elyaâs some sort of cold manipulator who plans to give the MC nothing for their efforts/refuse to give control over Krorid, especially since likely giving the MC Krorid solves two problems at once with virtually no drawbacks?
Thatâs okay, whoever said being in power would be easy?
I want my evil ending to leave the kingdom in shambles until I end the entirety of the Stiedry family and crush Radeâs little rebellion.
Looking at my tactician MC who got all âButchery upon the wallsâ, âThe atiming river massacreâ and âThe decisive blowâ achievements, sitting at an approximate 18000 kills
And many more will fallâŚ
And on the other hand there is my leadership MC who got âTotal Loyaltyâ and is sitting at like -2 jealousy with a 4 strength Elya.
And that is the perfect moment for the MC to negotiate that. The moment that she actually needs to give something to the MC if she wants to win.
That exactly what Lord Moren did, he didnât wait until the war is over to negotiate the independence, because at that time Ekya would just say no.
Are you really asking why a monarch would want to keep a huge chunk of land to themselves? Do you think she wouldnât go to war? She is already planning on how to not lose Krorid even before they get independence.
After she wins the civil war, she will not need the MC anymore, he will not have any bargaining chips to give to her.
No, because she is making sure you donât get Krorid.
And she doesnât need to be a cold manipulator to want to keep Krorid under her rule.
But there is nothing showing she wants that. And there is a drawback of her losing power.