Also same reason Guen would lead army in Camelot without Hippie there. Henry VIII first wife our beloved Spanish queen defend successfully the kingdom with henry was away marching herself to battle as a real Spanish princess
Leaving your enemies alive is the worst kind of mistake you can do! They will only try again.
@Promethea heee; Iâm glad youâre still enjoying it. 
The whole game is written in present tense, so I think the part youâre talking about should be âsaysâ to match all the other presents, but if Iâm missing some tense-nuance there, maybe someone can explain it?
As for money/ransom questionsâŚ
As Iâve said before, and as @Elfwine has pointed out, thereâs no money stat in this game. Itâs just not that kind of game. If Hrothulf were ransomed, the money would go into Camelotâs treasury (which is where Guenâs personal spending money comes from anyway), and while it would be a large amount, it wouldnât be enough to have really significant plot consequences.
Money issues are kept large and vague; for example, if Britain makes a trade agreement with Frankmarch, the increased prosperity might enable the Britons to field a better army or something. Exact currency amounts wonât come up, and the consequences of having more or less money in the treasury will only be dealt with insofar as they support the gameâs focus on characters.
So all that is to say, yes, @Fallaner, for the most part youâll have to headcanon whatâs happening with money. 
Hope that helps, but if I didnât answer something well enough, please ask again!
1 Like
I have a question did Camelot and Britain, metal mines? Because if there is a civil war in French, well maybe selling x or y or both could have future consequences in the last book in theory.
Thus far Iâve included a very brief mention of tin mines â tin was historically a major export from Britain, so I threw it in there. Other than that, I havenât done anything with mining yet. Depending on where the plot goes, maybe mining could become more relevant. Not sure yet.
What could become more relevant, the mine itself or the dispute between Lady Beatrice and Lord Aristause?
1 Like
lol
WHAT HAPPENED.
THIS IS WORSE THAT THE 40K HERESY SPAM IN CATAPHRAK THREAD.
What?
No, really. What are you referring to?
Your Arguments with Fallaner.
Fallner just used the Nazi Argument.
The dispute. 
Everything is ultimately about the characters.
@CaesarCzech This isnât the the first time the Guen thread has been Godwined. Sigh.
1 Like
blinks Wellllll⌠frankly it just felt like a valid argument to me⌠âŚWhy isnât it? âŚSo what if I invoke Godwinâs law?
âŚSometimes you can utilize those in a valid argument you knowâŚ
So that means we canât ransom Hrothulf, then kill him after we get the ransom gold, right?
1 Like
@NJG Probably not, just for plot structure reasons. It would involve me writing a whole other scene after Part 1 has ended, and it wouldnât result in major long-term changes in the plot or character relationships. Not that itâs a bad idea, itâs just that the amount of work it would take to integrate isnât worth it when Iâm already having such a hard time finishing Part 2.
That⌠that wasnât how I was using it at all⌠facepalm Why⌠why is this such a taboo subject to utilize⌠Iâm not saying âNazis! Therefore Iâm right!â⌠Iâm SAYING that people still punish people for crimes even WAY after they were committed! I could of used anything, sure, but the only one that came to mind were NAZIS because a Nazi being extradited from my country was on the news a month ago or so! They were an old man living in florida! AN OLD MAN.
I wasnât saying âNazis! Therefore Iâm right!â⌠Seriously⌠please⌠please actually read everything next timeâŚ
I could of used murderers, people who commit effectual treason, serial killers, someone who hijacked a plane and got a bunch of money from it, etc etc. I picked âNaziâ because ITS THE ONE THAT CAME TO MIND. My argument has nothing that requires Nazis⌠Therefore it is NOT âNazis! Therefore Iâm right!â itâs âWe still punish people for stuff they did a long time ago!â Nothing about that requires NazisâŚ
@jeantown It has nothing to do with tense, I meant that itâs âThe he saysâ instead of (probably) âThen he saysâ. Sorry for the confusion
Why are you yelling at me? I never said thatâs what you did. 
@Promethea OHHHHH 
Now I feel like a total idiot. Youâre right â fixed it locally, will appear in the next update. Thanks for letting me know, especially since spellcheck wouldnât catch that.
1 Like