Ah, okay, so those things make sense, and I’ll definitely try again!
Did you go to Mexico with West? Because there’s this graf: He teaches you how you do not necessarily need to kill to survive; with care and an exercise of will, you can feed from a mortal without drinking them dry. This is a necessary technique to passing unnoticed among the humans.
I did get the West line, and remembered it, but I didn’t get ‘they won’t remember you feeding on them’ from it. I did figure it out eventually, so I don’t think you have to make it more explicit.
What would you have liked to have had the option to say?
It might just be because I’ve seen this in a lot of other games recently, but I think I would have been fine with ‘Respond formally’, ‘Respond cooly’ and/or ‘respond excitedly’ or something like that, with it slightly influencing those two lines of text. Just for roleplaying.
I can add a lie tag, but what third option would you want there?
A way of breaking it off without involving a separate romance. I know this sounds dumb, but I was roleplaying as a hopeless romantic optimist, so I guess one of those cheesy lies they have in romance movies (like ‘I can never see you again. I can’t tell you why’).
That said, did you not get this line: "I appreciate your offering, ${mr} ${surname}. Now, tell me, what is it that you seek in return?"
I got that line, and I was happy with the choices I had role-play wise, but I didn’t see why knowledge was the only thing you could ask for when he offered you essentially anything. If it’s because my ambition was knowledge, then maybe that could be mentioned (‘I know you are interested in…’), or if everyone gets that question, maybe rewording it so he specifically mentions knowledge.
This is a large quote giving it context (right after I insulted Jesse about putting gas pipes in his master’s house)
“Is this the child of the beast?” Overstreet inquires. In life, she was a short, homely woman with mousy hair. Undeath has not made her physically more attractive, but she radiates self-assurance and—frankly—power.
“It is,” replies Van der Velde.
She sniffs. “You should be grateful for Van der Velde’s generosity. Taking you in and educating you in the ways of the Society was not something that he was obligated to do.”
“I am most grateful to Heer Van der Velde,” you reply honestly.
I didn’t kill West. Ah, and yes, my apologies, I didn’t check the Quaestors page in Vicksburg. Samantha Withers is listed there.
I’m not sure what you’re referring to. When you first approach him, you can ask him about the harmonica, about the regiment, what his name is, if you can write to him…none of those are “I’m madly in love.”
You’re right, I misremembered. When I went back and replayed just now, I realized that what I found odd was that the choice structure of ‘keep pursuing this path’ or ‘stop now’, which I’ve usually seen in game when you’re doing something especially dangerous. These were the three choices I encountered in a row (after first asking about the harmonica):
“Well, I suppose I should let you get back to your mess.”
“What is your name, Lieutenant?”
“Well, I suppose I should let you get back to your mess.”
“Will your company rendezvous with your regiment soon?”
Well, I suppose I should let you get back to your mess."
“Perhaps I can write to you, while you are on campaign. I would love to hear more about your travels…”
Like I said, I’ll definitely play more. This game feels like it would be a civil war module from Vampire the Masquerade, and I used to love reading through those rulebooks. It makes sense you guys have a deal with them now, I think Choicescript goes well with these kind of stories.