Breden, if he was a Kryptast asset, was never supposed to be a deep mole in a rebellion; he was a single-use disposable tool. In the Harrowing, if you don’t intervene early, Breden himself will almost be harrowed.
I think he is sort of on the fence about his allegiance? That might explain why is so fixated on the trust issue.
As for whether or not he actually engaged in any traitorous activity while in the rebellion…
There are several places where the MC may be suspicious of him.
If you send him out in the group scouting the Alastors, there will be casualties. A suspicious MC will think that this is evidence of sabotage; but there will be just as many casualties if you don’t sent Breden, so this shouldn’t be a mark against him.
He evades the trap you set out with the fake camp location. But he clearly knows that it is a trap, so it neither proves nor disproves his innocence.
If you send him to scout for merchant town / noble house, the place he finds will have extra Alastors.
This could also be interpreted both ways. Either he is the traitor and tipped off the guards, or the hidden traitor tipped off wherever he was going to in order to frame him.
I don’t know if this should matter, but the merchant town Breden picks does have less guild connections than the other one and would ordinarily be a better looting target.
The food poisoning incident. If you manage to keep Breden alive long enough to call a hearing, you will find that none of the cooks could have poisoned the food while it was being prepared; but there was a window of opportunity to poison the ingredients.
Which means that everyone is a suspect, including Breden.
Between ‘Breden is a traitor’ and ‘Breden is being framed’, I couldn’t find evidence either way; if anyone found anything please share with us.
…Please elaborate?
Also, he is the only one in the group who openly and full-heartedly hates the rebellion. Not very good spy material, but likely to turn on us.
But he’s dead, so if it was him we’ll never find out.