Face too beautiful, game couldn’t handle.
Same, I got that too. Is that supposed to happen or is the demo end there?
That’s not where the demo ends…I’m not getting the error, but I don’t know if that’s because I have different access? I’m sure it’s just a coding flub and it’ll get sorted when she has a sec. I know she was updating a lot yesterday.
Sorry, about that! I was out and couldn’t get to this until now. No, that’s not where the demo ends (the demo shouldn’t end with an error haha). The issue should be fixed now!
The error occurred due to an extra line I added about G if you choose a certain option when talking to R (that will only appear if you chose another thing earlier on when talking to M) but I accidentally used the same label twice
Not sure if it happens for the other characters, but the first flirt scene for G is the same for both options. From what i can tell looking at the code it’s entirely dependent on if you have symbols on or not rather than which option you actually picked.
Missing code for a pronoun. Happens immediately after the reveal that you’re still in the mansion.
I’ve fixed the pronoun error now, thank you so much for reporting it! As for the G flirting…there was a small error there too (one of the flirty options leading to the shy result), so another big thank you for bringing that to my attention. But yes, the content regarding that first flirt only differs in the beginning. Since G acts on their own and tries to get closer — either because you flirt back or because they notice that they’re able to fluster you — they both lead to the same text. This won’t be the case for all of their scenes, of course; it just made sense to me here, so I kept it that way hope that makes sense, but let me know if it doesn’t!
The symbols should only affect whether you see the “” or not next to certain options, not the content itself!
Damn, I didn’t know there was a remake in the work.
Alright finally got to play the demo, I can tell this is gonna be a thorough rewrite from what i’ve seen so far. Not that i’m complaining, it’s been a interesting direction so far and i’m a sucker for discerptions instead of plain numbers for stats/relationships. Can’t wait to see more
Haha yeah, it’s a pretty thorough one. It’s been 5+ years since I wrote the original after all so things are bound to change. I’m glad you like it so far!