@Farside :
Right, that’s what I figured. That in mind, how many options were you planning for those areas, apiece? (Besides the name of course…).
Also, since I notice you didn’t include the age, I’m guessing you have a firm idea as to a preset age. So, let’s hear it.
As for that, it’s insanely difficult to track down the number of spies the Soviets had, in particular since the USSR’s foreign intelligence serves are amongst the finest and most extensive history has ever seen, particularly in the modern era. If I had to wager a guess, the double betrayal you’re talking about in 1957 marked the death blow of the old Soviet spy networks (dating back to '17 and especially the '20’s-'30’s) that the USSR had set up in the US using American citizens. They did rebound crazy-fast though, but for a good couple of years they basically had to start from scratch since only their men and personnel protected by diplomatic immunity were really spared.
As for what books…toughie, and I’d have to think about it.
I feel the urge to vomit just suggesting this, but Ellen Shrecker’s supposedly the leading authority on McCarthyism in academia. Which is deeply unfortunate since- in my opinion- she’s a classical Useful Idjiot from what I can see (and I’ve had to read one of her books for College…oyyyyoy OYY!).
However, my personal misgivings aside, she might be something of a Useful Idiot but she is still useful. In particular, she’s a valuable source on seeing the kinds of things and dubious undertakings that the US and various other anti-communist organizations did on the home front and the damage to civil liberties that ensued. And the sources she cites are valuable on their own without her “input.” And on a more unintended note, I think some of her rhetorical knots might help get you in the mindset for the main character. Her fact checking isn’t always the greatest, but I think some of it would be a massive help in writing from the perspective of the true (and naive?) believer of the cause, who just wants to make the world a better place, moral myopia and all (like with a lot of the witch hunters…not so different?).
Granted, that’s in large part because she *is* a stunning example of one of those “true believers in the cause,” but hey…can’t be picky, right?
Just take a lot of what she says- particularly when not backed up by concrete citations or when making values statements- with MASSIVE grains of salt, and keep in mind she’s only really effectively covering McCarthyism and the as a social phenomenon in the US, rather than from the political/diplomatic/military standpoint that is the other side of the coin.
However, again, that’s just me, and my opinion (albeit honest). I think it’s a decent starting point, particularly to offset my own biases (and make no mistake, I am incredibly biased on this subject, so take that as you will) and particularly in making a character that’s serving the Soviet Union for ideology and ideals.