The Fernweh Saga: Book One (Discussion) [💚 Game Update, Post 1214]

I can go the cruel route, but I draw the line at being mean to the doggo. :stuck_out_tongue:

I could see my mean MC teaching the dog to growl at everyone but her, and laugh about it, though.

4 Likes

@E_RedMark I’m sure there’s going to be a lot of running… from the evil lurking in the shadows… or towards it if your MC is reckless :joy:

At least some of them must have exes or past flings, so If we ever meet them I wouldn’t mind because I love drama! I would love to be able to react differently, like play it cool, or become insecure, or be possesive like “hands off my man/woman!” :laughing: But please not Bowser, it’s too much drama even for me! :rofl:

@EvilChani Kinda same, I don’t like my characters to be unreasonably evil or mean just for the sake of it, so I have to come up with an explanation why they’re like that. Maybe something in their past made them that way, or it’s some kind of defense mechanism, or something like that. Basically, to enjoy the story I need to make sure that I like my character even if they’re a jerk, I need to understand them.
I plan to play a grumpy and aloof MC with B’s route, and a funny but secretly very smart underneath all the clownery MC with S.
If you will play cruel MC for either of them, do share your impressions, I’m intersted in how it’ll turn out!

@Snowflower Yeees, cruel MCs club unite! :imp:
I remember reading about your cruel MC, was that Laurel?

Oh, and I wasn’t mean to the doggo even with my cruel MC, never! :dog:

4 Likes

If it doesn’t make it in the game, it becomes Fanfic! :writing_hand:

Just imagine, if the romance is only one-sided. Like Bowser has the Hot for J and J only sees them as a Mentor! She can be so dense…so it is perfect! :sweat_smile:

1 Like

I hope that they all had past relationships (even if I suspect that J’s past relationships ended because their partner wasn’t MC, if MC and J have compatible gender/orientation). I also hope that they can end up with other characters after the lock-in point, if MC doesn’t pick them. I low-key ship J/R when MC isn’t pursuing them in the poly (or singly), and A/B is pretty neat (when B isn’t with MC).

MC building question: did your MCs have any romantic relationships in the period between their departure from and return to Fernweh? All three of mine (Arthur, Laurel, and my newest girl Roz (short for Rosemary)) definitely had past relationships (edited for autocorrect. Whoops).

5 Likes

If that’s the case, I’d like to know first so I can pick a single route and just play that one and no other ones. I don’t like making MCs that interfere with RO’s happiness with other people and screwing with author’s preferred pairings.

Only exception is A/B, who Reina will try to push together. Possibly Naia, too, not sure. But that’s mainly because I love B but their path doesn’t really appeal to me yet. If I find a MC that works with him, then I wouldn’t push him with A in my other routes. Anyway…

I am all for the past relationships for everyone, though, as long as it’s in the past. The Bowser thing, though… ewww!

Naia has had a single… fling. One of those things where they found each other hot and it was a sex-only connection that lasted until she started feeling trapped and bailed (he was fine with that, btw).

Reina dated two people–one nice guy and one utter turd. The first one is just something that didn’t work out (no spark), and the latter was the most recent. She’s over it, but wary.

6 Likes

@E_RedMark You know what… I can see that. I still don’t support the idea, but who am I to deny how amazing and wonderful J is, so if Bowser has the hots for them, it’s totally understandable, I can’t really blame the girl! :rofl:

@Snowflower I know we have just bonded over “cruel MCs club”, but I’m afraid I disagree with ROs pairing up if you don’t choose them, I’m too jealous for that, I can’t watch ROs happy with someone else if we’re not together :sob:
Confession: I decided not to do the poly route only because I’m afraid I will get jealous of J and R with each other :laughing:

5 Likes

Mine are all frigid like cactus :cactus:

This makes all the romances that much more necessary, life-saving in fact.

In Wayhaven, the ex by default is Bobbie. For once, I like to pick someone and my pick is Bowser :face_with_hand_over_mouth:

I imagine her grouchy, with an attitude of an old retired Bulldog…and she ignored my MC existence. The nerve!

My Mc didn’t say anything but Becca did. She is so sweet :slightly_smiling_face:

Bowser: How about you finish that report over a meal J?
J: No Thanks, I’m due to start my usual patrol. Maybe another time :slight_smile:
Bowser: Right, don’t stay up too light!
J: Will do Chief!

(Chief watch J walk out of her office and sigh looking down at the report)
Bowser: Damn newcomer, I have to try harder before that newbie makes a move!

Bowser’s memoir is titled: Musing of an old Grouch.

2 Likes

I’m not jealous, but as soon as I see the ROs pairing off with others, I have no desire to play more than the “top” path. I like the whole soulmate thing (fate/soulmate/whatever you want to call it), so if I am playing one route (say R’s) and see J get into a happy relationship with another RO or NPC, then I’m not going to play J’s path, since the author gave them their fate/soulmate already and my MC would just eff it up.

The poly is a bit different for me. If I saw J/R hook up during a W run, I’d be fine, except then I’d feel pressured to play the poly instead of R or J’s solo route. If there was no possibility for a poly, then if J/R hooked up, I wouldn’t play either of their paths. And would probably just play W’s route and be done with it.

4 Likes

My view on ROs pairing up when not selected is that it adds to the verisimilitude (it is the one blemish on Tin Star’s otherwise spotlessness that we cannot pair up Maria/Yiska in a more straightforward way), and I love matchmaking. Although I definitely want it to happen after MC locks in their RO (because I do not like false-advertising “ROs” at all). But we are all entitled to our own opinions and that’s OK.

In Fernweh Saga, I am also here for the potential dynamics between the ROs (J and B, B and anyone else if you got a certain achievement, W and anyone else, etc.).

5 Likes

I don’t mind ROs pairing off if it’s been awhile since the lock in (like if F crushes on Tina after a few books in Wayhaven, I’d be ok with that). But if in a matter of a few months the RO could have fallen in love with me or someone else (ahem, Crème de la crème), then it makes their route feel cheaper. Like it isn’t as serious/deep

3 Likes

Yes, me too! When I read fiction I want my MC’s and their RO’s love to be one of a kind, I want it to be special, like they could never be as happy with someone else as with each other. I want an epic love story, not a dull realistic bore! I might be okay with RO having some sort of an optional fling if you don’t date them, but if I see their side relationship getting so serious it overshadows the MC’s relationship with them it makes me upset. I don’t want my MC’s relationship to be treated as an afterthought compared to RO’s other potential partner, we’re literally the “main” character, for crying out loud.

I believe I saw you say that you enjoyed R’s solo route more than JR poly, correct? What you didn’t like about the poly? I wanted to play the poly route with my fifth charming and sociable MC, but then I decided to switch this MC to W’s route instead, and just randomly flirt with everyone for now. I still don’t know if I should stick with my original plan to play poly route or just fully switch to W :thinking:

@Snowflower The only side relationship I want to encourage is A’s crush on B when I will play B’s route. I want to spice it up, as I said, I do enjoy drama :smiling_imp:

3 Likes

Precisely. I play these things for escapism, not reality.

It’s bad enough that, in most of these games, I have to suffer through reading my MCs having never-ending angst fests (with nothing but longing looks, meaningless flirting, and “will-they-won’t-they” BS) until the end of the stories, where they can kiss/bang/get a relationship with their RO (since no one wants to do actual relationships). I don’t really want to have the MC be a “well, they were there and interested and I was bored, so whatever” thing for the RO, which is exactly how it comes off when the ROs start getting into relationships with other NPCs or ROs.

Actually, no. It comes off that way for my MCs. For the ROs that get to be with NPCs, they get the happy, schmappy, “we’re in love and everything is perfect and it’s us against the world!” romance with an actual loving relationship that happens quickly (because, apparently, they were meant to be), while my MCs get angst and no relationship till the end. To me, that’s even worse.

Right. Plus, I spend a lot of time developing MCs for these games, once I decide to play, then spend more time playing and figuring them out (who they are and how they fit into the universe). To do that only to later find out that the RO they hooked up with was happier with someone else means I get to toss that character–and the time I spent making them–into the garbage. And I don’t like wasting my time.

Honestly, it felt like my MC was in the way of J/R. There was more–not interaction, but emotion, maybe?–between J and R than between the MC and either of them. Granted, the MC has been away for a long time, but it was very unsatisfying to me. I may try again with another MC. With R’s solo route (and J’s, for that matter), it felt like there was more of a connection with the MC and them (until the end, anyway).

Give the poly a shot. You may interpret it differently than I did (and than my MC did). Of course, my run with the poly, Naia was all sweetness and light, save for a lot of snark. Now she’s grumpier and more stoic, but still very merciful, so the poly may play better now. Could’ve just been the MC that was bugging me, really.

I have yet to make up my mind on a MC for W. Not sure what she’ll be like. Both Naia and Reina flirted with W, but that was me god moding them so I could see what happened. Not sure what they’ll do when left to their own devices and they are more solid as characters.

I want to do that one, too, but mainly because I have no interest in playing B’s route at the moment!

4 Likes

I agree with you on all points about ROs dating other characters!
Apart from the angst part, I’m a huuuge angst fan :face_with_peeking_eye:

Oh no, that’s not good, the last thing I want is to be the third wheel :worried:

I’ll think about that, after all I can have six characters for each route. I just need to come up with one more interesting MC that would be different enough from the other five. Thanks for the detailed explanation, you gave me food for thought! :smiling_face:

4 Likes

Maybe make a more reckless, thinks with their heart, dangerously-merciful MC? That was Roz in a nutshell.

4 Likes

I don’t mind angst if it makes sense and isn’t based on childish bullshit, lack of communication, or one or both parties being too stupid to find their way out of a cardboard box. Like… insecurity is an understandable “angst” factor. Fear of being shit on when that’s all you’ve ever had from “relationships” is also understandable.

The angst I prefer is external angst–threats against the MC, threats against the LI, people trying to come between them, events stressing them out, etc–where the MC and RO work together to overcome these things. Throw in the drama and pain like that, and I lap it up.

But long-term tormenting your MC or LI–whether it’s the MC doing it to the LI or the LI doing it to the MC–with hot/cold behavior, conflicting signals, and/or verbal abuse (without a real discussion about it) raises my hackles.

That was my vibe, using my initial “take” on Naia. The end “status” of the “romance” (I still have an issue calling any of these romances yet) is also discouraging.

Your mileage may vary, however. And I think it might actually be fun to play the poly with a carefree, reckless snarker that really doesn’t care one way or the other. Alternative: a shy blushy type who stutters every time one of them speaks. That may work for the poly best. I just can’t stomach playing those.

4 Likes

That’s a good idea, I have a cruel and reckless MC, and a merciful and cautious MC, so mixing reckless and merciful together can create a different type of character!

@EvilChani That’s true, the quality of angst is also important, you can’t just throw random obstacles without reasonable meaning behind it just to make things harder. I do like my angst to be well-thought-out!

The problem is that I already played J’s route with a shy MC and R’s route with a flirty one, so now I can’t experience a new type of interaction with one of them in the poly, I have to either repeat being shy with J or flirty with R, otherwise my character will end up being inconsistent. I dug my own grave with that one :laughing:

Anyway, thanks for all the recommendations; I’ll give it a good think tomorrow and hopefully figure something out!

3 Likes

Nope. One was far too traumatized, the other was already sort of in love with J and never moved on. I admit to being one of those suckers for True Love/Soulmate stories. :smile:

8 Likes

This is really interesting. I haven’t played any other routes with my MCs. Hmm.

Gianna is the easiest. I made her with J us mind, but she’s best friends with R and theyre so funny together so i might pair her with Reese. Fanny i might be with B instead of R. I hadn’t paired them at first because I think they’re too similar. Charlotte (primarily S) is hard maybe R denial route? Naomi (B) i mught pair with J instead because as a job I headcannon her as a model, so I can see their childhood bond being reassuring that shes being seen as a person and not an icon. (Also she had a crush on him as children.)

Ultimately, I think everyone is perfect in their cannon romance, but if you held a gun to my head and made me switch them up this is how I would do it.

All my MCs had a crush on their RO of choice except Naomi because she didnt know B yet, but J was her first kiss.

This is adorable.

Gianna: only one, and the reason us because she was silently (and subconsciously)comparing every guy she met to J which for her was such a high standard. There was one though and that ended badly.

Fanny: no one

Charlotte: Between 1-3 serious ones.

Naomi: if you can call them that. She dates a lit, but her longest relationship lasted 3 months. (Poor B having to watch this, and listen to the endless “woe is me” stories)

7 Likes

@E_RedMark Add in the cake choice also! My MCs always go for the chocolate. :grinning: My MC moved a lot in Chp. 11. I have a feeling they will need to be in shape for Book 2.

Interesting point about the LIs and their Exs. It could introduce some interesting scenes in future books. Bowser with Jane–some interesting conversations could occur. Like @Snowflower, I would surprised if J had many flings; no basis in fact in this, just my own canon. There is also the name of the achievement for finishing on their route: ‘Always Yours’

On the other hand, I think that R would have had flings, but they were meaningless; just one night stands to scratch an itch. I think R would keep up his emotional guard, not letting anyone get too close. That is why I remarked in an earlier post that if R did have a fling with one of our MCs after just the brief time in Fernweh, then R would not have any feelings developing for the MC. He would enjoy and then run, in my opinion.

I am not yet sure how to read S. @Lambkin Do you have any thoughts?

My MCs tend to be kind, sincere, friendly, or somewhat merciful. I don’t usually play with a cruel MC, but based on what I am hearing, I am going to have to create another MC and force myself to go with all cruel choices (yes, even the dog, or maybe at least indifferent… I might feel too guilty since she seems traumatized or nervous). My new cruel and heartless MC will be Belladonna --do you guys have any other suggestions for poisonous flower MC names?? :laughing:

Trying to catch up with the discussion since work once again interfered with my fun.

6 Likes

Oleander if you plan to play a guy (Leander might work better as a name, more subtle). You can also pick a non-indicative or punny name (Laurel Hunter was meant to be the “achievement finding MC”, and became the “evil MC” over time). Or perhaps you could use it as a surname (Monkshood for example).

What did people find to be the scariest bit of Book 1? I was honestly rattled by the house-ruins nightmare when I resisted fully. And it takes a lot for text to rattle me.

6 Likes