Duly noted . I had been willing to partially attribute the continuation of certain notions to those thinkers possibly being slightly less than open-minded to counter-examples.
Yay! I got my experimental result (or as some would say a divine response from THE Oracle)! So now I amend my hypothesis accordingly… and note that the result blew my hypothesis out of the water …
So Telos-vision may be influenced by what its users expect, but if that is the case then it would be much harder to test. If even experienced Telos-vision users only understand a small fraction of what is shown by Telos-vision, then the following issues come to mind. As @cascat07 mentioned:
If different Telos-vision users perceive Telos-vision differently, is this because what is shown actually is different for different people, or is it because different people understand different fractions of what is shown? And how would you even determine which is the case?
I would bet on someone or something VERY old for the last one. Or perhaps old is the wrong adjective for something if it does not age at all or exists outside of time. It seems like the original Stormwright could only be a few hundred years old if that person is still alive. How old (if this term is even applicable) is Archlich Ghaesh?
@Havenstone Are there any creatures whose main sense is Telos-vision? Sort of like vornskrs in Star Wars? I imagine such creatures would be useful “guard-dogs/guard-creatures” for giving warning of hostile Theurges.
One of my MC’s goals is “letting the genie out of the bottle” then breaking the bottle into so many pieces that “all the king’s horses and all the king’s men” can never put it back together again. Partially, this is to reduce the incentive the Hegemony would have to simply assassinate my MC. While this may make the Hegemony desire vengeance more, there would also be less potential benefit for the Hegemony if it is obvious that assassinating my MC will only result in another wisard taking my MC’s place.