Good points all.
@P_Tigras
The opposed stat system and the poor definition of leadership (to the extent I can tell, I can’t really be sure of anything given how jumbled things are) were also things I felt like bringing up, to say the least. It certainly raises eyebrows.
Regarding slavery, that aspect of it was something I touched upon a bit earlier, though rather obliquely. I wholeheartedly agree with what you are saying but at the same time am still cautious and have my misgivings. I agree that as an institution (to the degree it can really be called a single institution) slavery was universally evil but not equally so, and was actually pretty complex and varied. Everybody tends to think of Southern (US) chattel slavery when they see the word, but that varied *very* considerably from when in started out as a (supposedly) more humane alternative to assimilate captured enemies rather than massacring them, and in particular tend to forget issues like in Classical Athens and Rome where there were often slaves with considerable holdings of their own (even other slaves) and even legal protection (like in Athens where it was illegal to mistreat or murder your slave).
On the whole, it was that knowledge that made me willing and interested to hear out how this would go, and to deal with things like Borion’s view of his own oppression. Because it can make sense, and a lot of the other material dealing with it (especially Borion finding all the loot and reminding him that he can/should have it too, because not everyone is a slave) seemed quite fitting. What twigged me- and this is still somewhat subjective- is that my gut felt uneasy because it seemed to be going *too* far in that direction. Seemed to be treating this as though it’s more subjective than it really is (take a look at the first convo option you have about it, when you are with Borion in the brig). Just because slavery is not uniformly practiced everywhere, slavers are humans (and varied) too, and it’s part of the culture… does not make it that excusable or really *palatable* in my opinion; the fact that we’re given so many options to give a glorified shrug to it and so few to speak out against it tweaks me wrong.
I’m not opposed to having a slaveowning society that is more than a one dimensional portrayal of evil, but I’m even more opposed to going the other way.
I feel like a bit from my other RP can help illuminate. One of the fanmade/completely constructed nations is an unholy mashup. They’re basically an unholy mismash of Golden Age/Age of Exploration Spain and Portugal, mixed with Francoist and Salazarian Spain and Portugal, mixed in with the Ottomans, mixed in with the Barbary and Somali pirate states, mixed in with Carthage (and with a bit of Roman and Italian thrown in for flavor/clarity, which unsurprisingly does nothing to make relations with the *actual* Italian expy anything less than seething hatred), mixed in with a completely fictional country based on one of the former which we stole the name and some of the styles from as a sort of shoutout.
With all that implies, both good and bad. They’re a vestigial empire that makes a huge part of its’ profits based on slavery, smuggling, and piracy. They’re quite culturally and materialistically advanced, and have produced a lot that hte rest of the world still looks to. They’re divided interally between a corrupt and wannabe totalitarian/absolutist imperial monarch on one hand, and various corrupt and thuggish “cartels” on the other. Moral principles, political freedom, economic freedom, and the idea of sacrosanct rights are all but alien to them. But so is racism; even the most established and powerful noble from a long-established line risks being stripped of everything and sent out to the fields to die if they lose an internal fight, but they will accept you as one of their own if you want to be one and walk the walk. This revolutionary in a world where their largest ally mass murders people for having blue hair and even the objectively more humane/“Good” nations and governments struggle with it. They also have a domestic slave system that is *at any given moment* probably as large as the West Indies/American slave trade was in total, and which is as inhumane or more than it ever was. That is because they were immensely innovative even though the industrial revolution barely affected/skipped over them (due largely to their dependence on slavery), and centuries before they turned the equivalent of the Sahara into one of the worlds’ most densely irrigated and populated areas on the planet, which needs constant and costly manpower and material commitments to keep running and thus stave off mass famine and collapse. They’re looked down upon and their national name is used as invective or shorthand, even by their most trusted ally; but they also vary from individual to individual and are not born pure evil or pure good.
But here’s the thing: make no mistake: collectively these guys- in the form of the cartels and the government- are the *Bad guys.* They are very much so. They are basically a threat second only to- and which serves as The Dragon of- an autocracy that mixes and mashes the Habsburgs, the Bismarckean Reich, Nazi Germany, Tsarist Russia, and the Soviet Union. And they keep pace and earn that spot very well.There are good guys inside it, yes, and complex individuals who do things other than for pure greed, thirst for power, or lust to be evil. But I don’t think *anybody* in the meta (and anybody but a few of the characters in the game) denies that as a system and a form of government, it’s inhumane and evil. Nothing racial about it, and there are plenty of real complexities and grey areas in how the system operates (to say nothing of the individuals themselves), especially since they view it as “how things are” and think- not implausibly- if it stopped it would bring indiscriminate ruin and death rather than just “the South getting ecconomically wrecked.”
But none of my fellow writers even *remotely* think this should be used to give them a pardon or full excuse. I think that sort of clarity is something that’s missing, or if it’s present it is coming across too subtly (at least in the demo.
Does that make any sense at all?
I can understand regarding Thisi, personally- as a Dragon Age fan- I wasn’t *that* bothered by Anders or Zevran coming on, and can’t really understand the Blind Raeg that a lot of my fellows went on, especially with Isabella doing the same to little objection. But like the others said, functionally I do think it *does* strip the player of some choice. The game promises you to choose whether you’re het, gay, or bi; yet regardless it forces you to be attracted to her? I read that as being a violation of that promise, to be honest, and it doesn’t sit well with me.