When your having gender selectable characters make sure their persona’s are the exact same. IT saves you lots of work. If you’re making a GS character make the male a ‘masculine’ version and make the female a ‘feminine’ version of looks. Not persona, I think to some people that would be sexist?
Now I’m wondering what kind of story it would be, if a genderflippable character would be Lecter as one gender and Watson as another.
That’s exactly what I meant 
Probably a messy one, lol. That sounds like a lot 
1 Like
On naming conventions, I prefer either alliterative names or a gender neutral name. From the perspective of a player who does replay the book but is otherwise in a vacuum, either way works on that front while I think Sarah/Zane gets confusing always. Sarah/Zane also seems like it would be confusing from a coding perspective.
However, I’m a nerd. I like to discuss things, and there are pros and cons to choosing gender neutral names vs. an alliterative name in discussions.
Gender Neutral Name:
Pro: One name makes it very clear the character is the same character.
Cons: It makes it a bit harder to distinguish between which gender we are discussing. Now often that won’t be relevant, but if I’m trying to have a discussion on the gender differences between Riley and Riley, I have to come up with a differentiation method. While not all that difficult, it’s less easily standardized and people may end up confusing traits specific to one gender of the character as being universal.
Alliterative Name
Pros:
- Similar names make it easier to realize these are the same character compared to using completely different names.
- As long as authors are intentional with their name choices, you can use the letter the character’s name starts with to indicate if you are discussing something that applies to the character regardless of their gender but if you are discussing something gendered, you can just use the name that goes with the gender of the character you are discussing.
Cons:
- Some people will still be confused by the fact that there are different names.
- The author loses the ability to use alliterative names for other purposes such as narrative symbolism, twins, etc.
As for appearance I couldn’t really vote because I don’t think the question actually gets at what changes I want in appearance. If and how appearance changes shouldn’t be just be based on a cisnormative idea of sex changes (ex: there are 6 ft tall women and 6 ft tall men, there’s no reason Sarah and Sebastian couldn’t both be 6ft tall unless it matters for the setting such as they are both high-profile models and so would have different height expectations based on industry standard)
Instead it should mostly change based on how that character is going to be influenced by their experience with gender given the setting of the game. This means that some characters who are either more likely to conform to gender norms or don’t really care about xyz feature and so just comply with whatever the gender norm is may have longer hair as a woman than they would as a man.
However, it is also totally reasonable that there are characters who really care about their hair being a certain length and would keep it that way regardless of gender. Maybe S has sensory issues around hair in their face or finds short hair easier to deal with and is not easily influenced by the opinions of others so they might both have short hair.
Maybe Sarah has it in a pixie cut while Sebastian has a more masculine cut. Or maybe S presents masc regardless of gender, and so both of them go to the barber and have a masculine haircut. Depending on the setting, this appearance feature may be the same, but the world around them may react differently to them, which will inform their actions as a character.
14 Likes
If the two characters are different enough, then you’re already writing 8–10 ROs, just in 4–5 slots.
9 Likes
I agree with a lot of this. I think a lot about how a lot of gender-selectability in IF falls short of actually doing anything interesting with gender selectability, re:
More than just appearances, I think this applies to most traits of GS characters, like a domineering man is treated exactly the same as a domineering woman or a shy man is treated the same as a shy woman when IRL these traits are reacted to very differently. It lacks nuance in the gender department, and sometimes (well, most of the time) I really miss that nuance.
I think there are some writers who struggle with the idea of how to write experiential/behavioral gender differences in a way that doesn’t come across as sexist (which is a fair concern), so they opt to ignore it completely; I guess the philosophy here is that because women and men are equally as capable, so they get to do just as many things, thus their experiences are basically the same. But then they leave in, frankly, weirdly essentialist or culturally specific ideas like “man short woman tall” and “man have short hair woman have long” without questioning that idea at all.
One of the better examples I can think of that has a thoughtful handling of gender-flipping characters (beyond IFs like I The Forgotten One or even Ortega in FH) isn’t an IF at all, but the manga Dungeon Meshi.
Extremely minor spoilers
There’s a short gag where the main character, Laios, is looking into a wishing mirror to see why another character, Toshiro, likes Laios’ sister Falin (who he is extremely similar to) so much, but hates Laios. In the mirror, he sees what life would be like if Toshiro were a woman, and F!Toshiro has Laios as the object of her affection; her relationships were completely different just because of cultural attitudes about how men and women should interact. Confused, Laios runs through different universes where he and his friends are gender-flipped.
F!Laios is living a very different life and never became an adventurer, because she never went to military school like M!Laios and escaped her controlling father, so she has no choice but to live the way he wants (extremely traditional gender roles). M!Falin, on the other hand, is very similar to his female counterpart, because unlike Laios, F!Falin was able to escape her father to go study magic. M!Marcille is nearly identical to F!Marcille for similar reasons, and M!Marcille has hair just as long and well-maintained as F!Marcille. Kabru is a character that is a manipulative liar with good intentions, but while M!Kabru is best able to achieve his goals by playing the part of an intrepid explorer, F!Kabru finds more success by exploiting her sexuality. Meanwhile, a character like Izutsumi, who has no allegiance to society and social norms and only knows how to be true to herself, is the same regardless of gender.
Overall, it does a lot of interesting stuff with the idea of not just gender roles, but how people are forced to conform to them and who gets to be exceptions to that rule. Some must conform due to circumstances outside their control, some are able to escape, some are aware of how they are perceived and use that to their advantage, and some just simply don’t give a shit.
11 Likes
For names, I’m writing one flippable character at the moment, and they always have the same nickname, but a different full name. So it’s Wilson, Wilma, and Willow, but 9/10 times the narrative just calls them Wil.
4 Likes
Wait what?
3 Likes
Yeah. All those gender neutral princesses* out there…
*technically it’s actually “woman of high rank.” So never will this name be gender-neutral, any more than Amir, which is “prince” or “he who’s vision will never die” is. Just for those of you wondering. shrug Also, various sources will have varoius meanings, yes, I know. But these two names specifically are not gender neutral by their very basic meanings.
4 Likes
Didn’t choose anything in the polls, since I’m mostly fine with all the options.
One ‘mistake’ I’ve seen a few times when games use unisex names, is that sometimes those names are actually heavily gendered, but used for male or female in very different cultures, so using them for the same gv character might not make so much sense.
One common way I see authors dealing with their gv characters having very differing names, is to give them a somewhat unrelated nickname, that they prefer to be called by, so their actual name don’t come up much, and the readers have a name to use whan discussing them.
7 Likes
With gender neutral names, yeah, at some point it’s easy to repeat them with other games too - I can’t count the number of Wren’s that I’ve seen over the VNs and WIP’s I’ve read. Wren, Sam, Taylor etc. you will run out at some point.
But I also don’t think it’s a big deal if a male character - or female character - has a name more commonly used for men or women. It can even be referenced.
As for the nickname - very good point!
Lighten up, dears. It was just an example. And yes, princess can be a gender neutral term 
Everything can be gender neutral if you try.
6 Likes
Princexx/Princex/Prinx/Prin/Prinxe/Princet/Princette/Princev/Princen/Princus/Heir Other gender neutral terms for Prince/Princess/Royalty incorporating the letter x ; a common indicator of gender neutral language.
Gender neutral language in English - Nonbinary Wiki.
Did some research!
3 Likes
Ultimately it’s just a string of consonants and vowels we assign meaning to, I’m not that uptight about it. I was curious whether you had some anecdote in your pocket about how it has evolved into a masculine or neutral name I wasn’t aware of or if you were trying to make fetch happen or whatever.
1 Like
They probably weren’t literally meaning that Sarah was a gender neutral name. More just like a placeholder for [insert unisex name] because they were using Sarah as an example name in all three options. So the (gender neutral) part is the important part there, not the actual name being used. You could probably fill in the blank with, say, “Sam” for example.
At least that’s how I automatically interpreted it.
6 Likes
I don’t need to lighten up, I just find names, their meanings and their history interesting and I thought that maybe other people might as well.
9 Likes
“And yes, princess can be a gender neutral term”
Personally…I actually often use usually uh gendered (?) terms as gender neutral terms and not in an insulting way. Only around others that do it too since I know it can be seen as insulting to some people.
“I just find names, their meanings and their history interesting and I thought that maybe other people might as well.”
That was interesting!
personally not a huge fan of replacing letters with x for gender neutral terms but that’s just me lol
3 Likes
Honestly, if you’re going to have gender-variable characters, just make them 90% the same. To me, majorly different characterization among gender variants just comes across as Butterfly Effect at best and gender essentialism at worst. If your setting demands that the genders have significantly different life experiences, don’t have gender-variable characters.
4 Likes
Considering it’s easier to add checkpoint systems to choicescript now, I was wondering if this is preferred over a Chapter Select menu. Ideally, having both in one game is best, but not all games would work with Chapter Select. If you had to choose one, which do you prefer to use?
- I prefer games with a checkpoint system
- I prefer to select which chapter to go back to/restart the chapter
- No opinion/don’t use either
0
voters
Also, do you like having a Cheats menu in games?
- I like playing with Cheats
- I like playing with Cheats but not on my first playthrough
- I don’t like playing with Cheats
- No opinion
0
voters
3 Likes
In pushed I’ve put a option in the beginning for you to choose what chapter you would like. I haven’t gotten any complaints, I think Lost in your eyes (WIP) [3 Ch, 210K words] [Vampires/Romance/Dark Fantasy, supernatural] also has that!
It gives the player options just in case if they haven’t played it yet and if they did.
3 Likes
When playing as an arromantic and/or asexual character, do you want to be able to opt out of romantic/physical interactions individually? Or would you prefer to opt out of all romantic/physical interaction?
For example:
- Opt out individually: the story plays out exactly the same than for an allosexual MC. You can kiss a character even if you previously say to them that you don’t like kisses (you have to initiate the action though)
- Opt out of all: if you say you don’t like kisses, for example, you won’t be offered the option to kiss anybody.
- Opt out individually.
- Opt out of all.
0
voters
I know this is an oversimplification of the issue, but I wanted to know your opinions. Thank you!