Others have already responded, and emphasized the point that this is not a historical medieval story, this is another world and it is High Fantasy, Not Low Fantasy, and I believe you may have confused two different places with different cultures when talking about Eleazar and reputation, but I will talk more about it below. I will leave aside the world issues, as others (Thank you) have already responded and explained.
But sleeping with one bastard is basically in the view of the Petrunians, tainting their blood and more, many even see it as cursing or other terrible things. So you got it right in the sense that yes, this is seen as tainting their blood and something of great repudiation by the Petrunian houses, who are mostly proud.
In Darian things are different, okay. Very different, as I mentioned above in the link and in the text.
In summary: Petrus cares more about reputation
Darian cares more about strength.
Now a point that has not been talked about yet and that I think you interpreted wrong and confused me when you said that I said that all that matters to the father (Eleazar) of the MC is appearance, this gave me a short circuit and I went back to read up to see if I had said that and forgotten. You said âYou said in the quoted message that appearance is everything for someone like MCâs father, but why is there no consequence for cutting him with the sword in public? Thatâs a very grave loss of face that isnât addressed later at all.â
But in the text I said that for Darian and Eleazar: âBeing well regarded is much more important to the Petrunians than being stronger, UNLIKE DARIAN, which values STRENGTH and BLOOD more than anything else, itâs no wonder that many Darians donât care how they will be seen, even if they are considered cruel or extremist. (Eleazar is an example) Or anything else like that.â I think the confusion came from the fact that it could be interpreted that Darian also values reputation more, since both Petrus and Darian were mentioned. I apologize if it was confusing in the text.
Therefore your comparison with the MCâs affront to Eleazar in DARIAN, and what happened in PETRUS can be interpreted as affronts from both (MC and Hayden). Of course, it is a valid question, but in the case of the MC, this does not stain their reputation, even though there may be gossip, it does not carry the same weight as what Hayden did. Do you understand? Because there, many may see what the MC did as courage, like âOh, he dared to attack the Duke himself! What a foolishness! Shame and etc.â but it can also be interpreted by others from the people of Darian as âLook how brave he/she/they are! Dared to try to attack the Duke! And did not fear!â and so on.
Additionally,
Hayden
Hayden will be forced into other marriages later on one way or another. What Hayden did was buy time by tarnishing his reputation.
Any other questions, feel free to ask and talk