I’m more concerned that if you’re pitting the left-wing as the only (playable) radicals instead you are presenting the Monarchist Conservatives as the only reasonable and patriotic option here, giving the country some “tough love” and by doing that you’ll be playing right into the hands of people like our current PM mr. Rutte and his youth wing.
While I know you consider them to be less bad than Le Pen, WIlders and Trump they are by no means the only reasonable alternative to chaos and anarchy, which would be the narrative a lot of our centre-right media would take away from your altered game instead, where they to review it and spend some time covering it.
As a left-wing inclined player of this thing, that would irk me too.
This is certainly true and you need to write what you feel comfortable writing, again I’m just voicing my concerns here that by pitting Solidarity against the Conservatives you’re making it seem like a game about the radical left versus the “reasonable” center (ha) right.
One possible solution is to replace Solidarity with a social fascists Social Democrat path that either substitutes for or plays in addition to the current Solidarity path as that would change the theme to put less focus on the “reasonable” right-wing giving the country some desperately needed “tough-love and austerity” and more to a center must hold in the face of extremism type of narrative that is not outspokenly left or right-wing biased and would thus be more palatable to me and people like me.
Either way it would mean a lot of work for you and it is ultimately your decision.
I would still play Solidarity of course, provided the option is left in, but I’m just going to call it how I see your proposed new dichotomy possibly go down in the media if they suddenly cared enough to cover it.
Ah, @Eiwynn you sly temptress, up to your old tricks again eh? Yes, I see why you’d champion such a royalist party, with your mc as the Queen, of course. 