I am currently redisgning the rules for my second contest which now named CScomp.
I am having a lively debate over one of the rules for the judges. I value their opion but disagree with them.
I want to be fair so I thought I’d seek a boader responce base to make my final decision.
There will be six judges that are encourage to read and score all game submitted. If a judge has to drop out they must have scored 2/3 of the games for their scores to be counted.
Person A gets theirs read first, then Person B, C and D - Something has come up!
Half the judges quit, and don’t read or rate E, F or G.
B C D get 6xPoints and E F G get 3xPoints Unfair Balance
(You can’t mathematically compensate for missing judges as each one will mark differently to other judges/judges should judge all entries or none)
It should be possible to mathematically compensate for the loss of a judge(s). There for fair to all involved.
I do not wish to sway anyone so will with hold which is my opion. Thank you for help.