Guenevere (WIP)

Behavior is part genetic partly environmental.
And seeing as being raised in the 1400 wouldnt make me more loved by people I would still be as misanthropic depressing jealous and sych as I am now
Nothing back then would make me as kind and honor bound as you think.

Who said anything about kind and honor bound?

That’s… Actually a great point.
In fact, Lance probably thinks he’s being charming (as he is, quite obviously, in the 15th Century) by courting Guen and trying to be affectionate, instead of bluntly asking the MC on a date. Plus, he adds some

drama!

But if he steals Morgana’s spotlight he will be exectuted.

To The DEATH!

1 Like

By honor bound I mean that you think I would care of honor.
Honor is pretty worthless.

I think you should stop assuming that I think that you would become honorable when I’ve said nothing of the sort.

Not to the people of the 15th century.

1 Like

…which wasn’t in the Jeantown-verse. I know there are a lot of posts on this thread, but I’m pretty sure it’s been mentioned many times that there is no single canon for the Arthur legends; different writers have always taken them in totally different directions.

So there’s really no need to be flabbergasted when Jean does something different from Random Arthurian Picture I Found On The Internet. :smile:

When Jean said she hope you were kidding, I’m pretty sure it wasn’t in reference to the typo, but because a Molotov cocktail is too modern to be appropriate in the context.

2 Likes

Direct quote from the most reliable place in the world: Wikipedia!

Improvised incendiary devices were used for the first time in the Spanish Civil War between July 1936 and April 1939,[6] before they became known as "Molotov cocktails". In 1936
1 Like

My views on life wouldn’t change then.
The only difference is I might be less knowledgeable about science.

Yeah, it’s not as if anything else might possibly be different for someone taught different things.

I’m not going to even try to find a sarcasm tag there.

Teaching me morals would be pointless as mentally my personality i’m too chaotic and fragmented.
And also what would I be learning as a peasant?
Were peasants even taught about honor and chivalry and such?

Somehow, at this point I have to wonder how, you were (in this time) taught how to read and write, and what honor is. I’m fairly sure that you’d be taught something back then, whether you want to think of yourself as immune to outside influence or not.

1 Like

@faewkless
The thing is you can’t possibly know what you would be like if you were born in the 1400s simply because you would have been raised completely differently, in a totally different environment to what it’s like now. True you would likely have some of the same personality traits that you have inherited- but the way you think would probably be completely different to how you think now.

…But I’m getting off-topic :smile:

2 Likes

@Havenstone

:open_mouth:. Oh. I gotta keep that in mind when beta testing a medieval fantasy game.

:open_mouth:. Oh.

@ everyone in the Guenevere thread who’s discussing how their personalities if they existed in the Middle Ages:

Can we please stop discussing how we would be like in the Middle Ages? It seems weird. For all we know, we might even be a peasant farmer or related to some random noble family, or a middle class guy.

@jeantown
1a) Will Mordred have an aversion against using swords, just be bad at swordfighting or will he have other reasons not to use them?
b) Couldn’t he occasionaly wear one?
c) Wouldn’t people in general expect someone who wants to be king to be armed?
2) Couldn’t the navy be used without Guen’s or Arthur’s direct involvement, for example if the player chose to build a navy, an invading force in a later part would arrive weaker due to losses in an off-screen naval battle?

1 Like

I vote that Mordred deliberately avoid wearing a sword, and use a mace or something, just to demonstrate that picking at the tiniest possible details is a waste of time.

1 Like

I’m loving all this Morgana love. It really tickles me that everyone is all ā€˜ugh I hate Arthur’/ā€˜Nooo, Arthur’s lovely’ and ā€˜Eughh Lance sucks’/Leave Lance alone!’ yet when Morgana comes up almost everyone unanimously is just like ’ Oh Morgana? Yeah, she’s the bomb.’

12 Likes

We need an updated FAQ with all of Jeantowns wonderful replies! (:

1 Like

Morgana has that perfect mix of principles and pragmatism that means whichever way you swing, you can like that about her.

4 Likes

That sort of discussion is exactly what this thread is for. :slight_smile:

This.

A poorly-led army might still be able to do okay if someone’s burning up the enemy archers with magical fire, or constantly healing her wounded fighters… but don’t worry, leadership!Guen should get the most glory. :smile:

This is extremely important to me. I’m so sick of stories with interesting characters, where the male characters get developed and change over time, but the female characters, awesome as they are, are just statically awesome with no development (coughStarWarsRebelscough). Unfortunately, I’m also going to be upholding the common trope of female character development that if female characters change, 80% of the time it’s to do with something sexual or maybe romantic (and like 15% to do with children), since Morgana’s first point of major character change will be Mordred’s conception. I’m not happy about that, but I’m kind of stuck with it, and I really hope I can avoid that trope in the future.

Noted… Honestly, I still have no idea if/when I’ll bring Julia in, but it’s good to know people are interested.

:stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes: Exactly. Arthur’s assumption that women can’t have sex with each other says a lot about how limited his idea of sex is (in part 1, anyway).

Yes. Yes, it would be. That one, however, is definitely off the table. :smile:

@Havenstone is my knight in shining armor.

As a member of the nobility, he’ll wear a sword sometimes out of obligation, but he has no interest in learning to fight or becoming a knight. There are two main reasons for this: one, he just isn’t physically predisposed to be a fighter; he’s slight and willowy, had health issues as a child, and was bullied by other children; and two, since his childhood he has utterly hated Lancelot and everything Lancelot stands for, so he wants to differentiate himself from Lance as much as possible and abhors all things knightly. He may also try to leverage his non-fighting nature to gain public approval – he presents himself at the anti-Arthur, the one who will truly bring about peace and doesn’t need to do it at sword-point.

Theoretically, there’s no reason why not; I’d just need a reason why-to.

I never realized how tough it is to write FAQs. Like, how long should they be, really? I could make it really, really long, but then people would have to wade through tons of text to find the answer they’re looking for, which means they’d probably just ask me directly because that’s easier, thereby defeating the whole purpose of the FAQ. But if a question isn’t on the FAQ, it’s going to get asked again and again… argh, I don’t know. :smile:

Oh, that’s a lovely way to describe her; thank you. I’m going to keep that in mind as I continue to develop her.

4 Likes